SPBD's mission is to improve the quality of life of people living in poverty in the poor island nations of the South Pacific. Our first market is the independent island nation of Samoa, in the middle of the South Pacific. SPBD is a replication of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh. The Grameen Bank, founded by Prof. Mohammed Yunus, is the pioneering organization in the field of micro finance.

Poor people in Samoa suffer from absolute poverty that is driven by a poverty of opportunity. This poverty of opportunity is based on the fact that there are few traditional waged employment opportunities available in Samoa. For most rural Samoans jobs just do not exist. SPBD provides small, unsecured loans to groups of rural women. Women invest their loans into businesses based on their existing livelihood skills.

SPBD's philosophy of lending is based on a respect for each individual's innate human ingenuity, drive and self esteem. It is these qualities which make people credit worthy, not the collateral which traditional banks demand. By providing access to capital, SPBD allows women and their families to pursue their dreams and achieve their full potential.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING SPBD’S SOCIAL METRICS

 
SPBD utilizes the following Social Metrics Survey to determine the eligibility of prospective borrowers into its lending program as well as to determine the impact its programs are having on its clients. Borrowers are assessed across 4 main categories (detailed below) and rated on a 1 – 3 scale with 1 represent the LEAST positive score with 3 representing the BEST positive score. SPBD’s goal is to conduct Social Metrics Survey during every loan application so that it can evaluate the impact of its lending activities on its borrowers’ quality of life.

Given the comprehensive and personal nature of the Social Metrics Survey, SPBD has chosen only to include certain clients’ assessments in its borrower profiles when available. However, listed below are the specific metrics the organization assesses that compromise each of the different categories listed in the borrower profiles.

SUMMARY OF SPBD’S SOCIAL METRICS SURVEY

 Each of the 4 Social Categories listed below average the individual scores assigned to each metric within that category. The 4 categories are then averaged to produce an overall Social Metric Score for an individual borrower. SPBD prioritizes borrowers that have an overall Social Metric of 2.0 or lower as these clients represent a more vulnerable & poor population.

CATEGORY 1: HOUSING INDEX

 1. Size of Housing: 3 – Big; 2 – Medium; 1 – Small

 2. Condition of Housing: 3 – Strong; 2 – Old; 1 – Bad

 3. Condition of Roof: 3 – Best (New Galvanized Iron); 2 – Good (Old Galvanized Iron); 1 – Bad (Scraps, leaves, etc.)

 4. Condition of Post/Wall: 3 – Best (New Cement/Lumber); 2 – Good (Old Cement/Lumber); 1 – Bad (Scrap Lumber/Use Materials)

 5. Condition of Flooring: 3 – Best (New/Smooth Cement); 2 – Good (Old/Rough Cement); 1 – Bad (Partly Cemented/No Flooring)

 6. Condition of Toilet: 3 – Best (Flush with Cement/Tiled Floor); 2 – Good (Flush with Rough Flooring); 1 – Bad (Pit Toilet/None)

 7. Toilet Ownership: 3 – Owned; 2 – Shared; 1 – None

 8. Condition of Bathroom: 3 – Best (Proper Piping with Flooring); 2 – Good (No Piping with Rough Floor); 1 – Bad (No Bathroom)

 9. Bathroom Ownership: 3 – Owned; 2 – Shared; 1 – None

 10. Housing Ownership: 3 – Owned; 2 – Rented; 1 – Shared 


CATEOGRY 2: HOUSEHOLD INDEX

 1. Type of Asset: 3 – Luxury; 2 – Necessity; 1 – Inadequate

 2. Quantity: 3 – Extravagantly Furnished; 2 – Moderately Furnished; 1 – Barely Furnished

 3. Quality (Brand): 3 – Popular & Expensive; 2 – Popular but Cheap; 1 – Unknown Brand

 4. Physical Condition: 3 – New & Working; 2 – Old & Working; 1 – Damaged

 5. Age of Assets: 3 – New; 2 – Old; 1 – Obsolete

 6. Total Marketable Value: 3 - $110,000 WST+; 2 - $15,000 - $110,000 WST; 1 -

 7. Manner Assets Acquired: 3 – Purchased by Borrower; 2 – Purchased by Relatives; 1 – Gift or Inherited

 8. Ownership: 3 – Owned; 2 – Shared/Rented; 1 – None

 
CATEGORY 3: INDIVIDUAL SOCIAL STATUS INDEX

 1. Family Living Arrangement: 3 – Immediate Family; 2 –5 additional members; 1 – More than 5 additional members

 2. Marital Status: 3 – Single; 2 – Married; 1 – Divorced/Widowed

 3. Education: 3 – Tertiary; 2 – Secondary/Primary; 1 – Uneducated

 4. Number of Dependents: 3 – 0 to 3; 2 – 4 to 10; 1 – More than 10

 5. Ages of Dependents: 3 – 0 to 15 years; 2 – 16 to 25 years; 1 – 26+ years

 6. Health Condition: 3 – Very Healthy; 2 – Healthy; 1 – Sickly

 7. Length of Residency: 3 – More than 3 years; 2 – 1 to 3 years; 1 – Less than 1 year

 8. Family Reputation: 3 – Best; 2 – Good; 1 – Bad

 9. Community Reputation: 3 – Best; 2 – Good; 1 – Bad

 
CATEGORY 4: HOUSING INCOME INDEX

 1. Number of Earners in the Family: 3 – More than 3; 2 – 2 to 3; 1 – 1 or less

 2. Nature of Income: 3 – Regular; 2 – Contract/Casual more than 26 weeks a year; 1 – Contract/Casual less than 26 weeks a year

 3. Level of Total Household Income: 3 – Above $7,750 WST per week; 2 - $1,500 - $7,750 WST per week; 1 – Less than $1,500 WST per week


September 28, 2011
 
As part of an ongoing effort to fully migrate risk ratings to our new and enhanced risk rating system, Kiva has conducted a re-assessment of the level of risk posed by this institution.
 
During this re-assessment, our analysts were able to gather updated operational and financial information about the institution, as well as speak with key members of the staff
 
The information gathered during this process, together with the Kiva's new risk rating system and half-star support, has led us to revise SPBD's risk rating from 4 to 2.5 stars. The analysts have found that SPBD's risk variables, reviewed in the new risk rating model, were most representative of a 2.5-Star rating.
 
In the partner page update from February 18, 2011, Kiva noted that the results of this re-rating procedure had been previously inadvertently published (this was before Kiva had added support for half-stars):
 
Last week, Kiva inadvertently published the results of this re-rating procedure without giving SPBD a chance to review our findings and respond to them. As a result, the revised risk rating of two stars may have been based on incomplete information. 
 
Kiva is now working with SPBD to give them a chance to review and respond to the rating generated by the new risk rating system. In the meantime, the original risk rating of four stars has been restored until this matter can be resolved. 
 
We will work with SPBD to resolve the risk rating as soon as possible, and will keep this page updated with further updates as information becomes available. 
 
Kiva has now successfully worked with SPBD to give them a chance to review and respond to the rating generated by the new risk rating system.  SPBD has been informed of our analysts’ findings and their corresponding change in rating.
 
We have prepared a blog post with more information on Kiva's new and enhanced risk rating system, along with a chart showing the relative magnitude of the overall changes for Kiva's portfolio.  To view that, please go here: http://www.kiva.org/updates/kiva/2011/09/07/kiva-risk-ratings-now-with-half-stars.html.

February 18, 2011

South Pacific Business Development (SPBD) has been a longstanding partner of Kiva's for over four years, successfully paying back $2,177,425 in loans since the partnership began in July of 2006.

As part of an ongoing effort to fully migrate risk ratings to our new risk rating system, Kiva conducted on-site monitoring at SPBD in order to re-assess the level of risk posed by this institution. During this visit our analysts were able to gather updated operational and financial information about the institution, as well as meet with key members of the staff.

Last week, Kiva inadvertently published the results of this re-rating procedure without giving SPBD a chance to review our findings and respond to them. As a result, the revised risk rating of two stars may have been based on incomplete information.

Kiva is now working with SPBD to give them a chance to review and respond to the rating generated by the new risk rating system. In the meantime, the original risk rating of four stars has been restored until this matter can be resolved.

We will work with SPBD to resolve the risk rating as soon as possible, and will keep this page updated with further updates as information becomes available.

 


Kiva HelpRepayment Performance on Kiva

    This Field Partner All Kiva Partners
  Start Date On Kiva Jul 31, 2006 Oct 12, 2005
Total Loans $2,946,825 $280,713,025
Amount of Raised Inactive Loans $0 $10,525
Number Of Raised Inactive Loans 0 17
Amount of Paying Back Loans $381,125 $76,564,275
Number Of Paying Back Loans 617 92,262
Amount of Ended Loans $2,565,700 $204,138,225
Number Of Ended Loans 4,112 280,125
Delinquency Rate 0.00% 2.45%
Amount In Arrears $0 $1,254,316
Outstanding Portfolio $299,201 $51,149,836
Number of Loans Delinquent 0 11,545
Default Rate 0.00% 1.12%
Amount of Ended Loans Defaulted $0 $2,280,201
Amount of Ended Loans $2,565,700 $204,138,225
Number Of Ended Loans Defaulted 0 6,779
Currency Exchange Loss Rate 0.00% 0.00%
Amount of Currency Exchange Loss $0 $12,824
Refund Rate 0.47% 1.24%
Amount of Refunded Loans $13,800 $3,477,150
Number Of Refunded Loans 27 4,129

Kiva HelpLoan Characteristics On Kiva

    This Field Partner All Kiva Partners
  Loans To Women Entrepreneurs 99.80% 74.90%
Average Loan Size $564 $389
Average Individual Loan Size $600 $618
Average Group Loan Size $1,739 $1,631
Average Number Of Entrepreneurs Per Group 6.2 8
Average GDP Per Capita (PPP) in Local Country $6,344 $3,402
Average Loan Size / GDP Per Capita (PPP) 8.89% 11.42%
Average Time To Fund A Loan 3.17 days 3.96 days
Average Dollars Raised Per Day Per Loan $177.96 $98.13
  Average Loan Term 12.66 months 9.26 months

Kiva HelpJournaling Performance on Kiva

    This Field Partner All Kiva Partners
  Total Journals 1,477 131,404
  Journaling Rate 34.07% 39.40%
  Average Number Of Comments Per Journal 0.14 0.16
  Average Number Of Recommendations Per Journal 10.61 4.21

Kiva HelpBorrowing Cost Comparison (based on 2009 data)

    This Field Partner Median for MFI Peers in Country All Kiva Partners
  Average Interest Rate and Fees Borrowers Pay (Portfolio Yield) 49.00% 49.00% 36.11%
  Average Partner Return On Assets (Average Profitability) 9.6% 9.6% -1.45%
  Average Loan Size (% of Per Capita Income) 10.46% 10.00% 43.69%

Kiva HelpCountry Fast Facts

Field Partner Staff

Peniamina Afualo
Maros Parreno Apostol
Team Editing
Aaifou Faamausili
Lusila Inu
Fetafiana Itielu
Tafi Itielu
Wendy Joe
Mayvian Koti Popese
Luapene Lefau
Litara Mataia
Raymond Mc Carthy
Aumau Omeka
Adria Orr
Lanu Papalii
Keiolani Samuelu
Tea Taanoa
Fautua Talaoloa
Keneth Jay To
Tuiafutea Tuala
Isabel Tuatagaloa
Nate Walsh